Mediation

John-Paul S. Deol mediates high-stakes employment, business, and other civil disputes. Parties and counsel select him for matters that require a neutral with substantial experience on both sides of the table, fluency in the substantive law, and the judgment to move difficult disputes under pressure.

Experience on Both Sides

Most mediators have spent their careers on one side of the dispute. John-Paul has spent his time on both.

He has represented senior executives, founders, partners, investors, and other accomplished professionals. He has also represented Fortune 100 corporations, publicly traded companies, growth-stage technology businesses, investment firms, healthcare systems, and venture-backed startups.

That background shapes how he handles cases. He understands what an executive faces when she is being separated, and what a board faces when it has to make that call. He understands what a founder is thinking when his co-founders try to push him out, and what those co-founders are thinking when they decide it has to happen.

He knows what plaintiff’s counsel will accept, what defense counsel will pay, and why. He does not deliver one-sided arguments dressed up as neutral evaluation, and he does not push parties toward numbers that reflect only one side’s view of the case. He helps each side see the case as the other side actually sees it, which is usually where settlements come from.

Disputes He Mediates

John-Paul mediates a range of employment and civil matters, including:

  • Executive and partner separations, severance disputes, and equity and compensation fights, including disputes over RSUs, options, carried interest, and deferred compensation

  • Discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and whistleblower claims, including matters involving allegations against senior people in an organization

  • Trade secret and restrictive covenant disputes, including non-compete, non-solicit, and confidentiality matters

  • Wage and hour disputes, including individual misclassification claims, class and collective actions, and PAGA representative actions

  • Founder and partner disputes, including disputes over equity, control, governance, and exit

  • Business and commercial disputes involving employment, ownership, or fiduciary issues

He has particular experience with cases where the dollar exposure is substantial, the relationships are complicated, prior settlement efforts have failed, or the dispute carries reputational stakes for one or both sides.

Training and Appointments

John-Paul completed the Advanced Mediation Intensive at Harvard Law School’s Program on Negotiation, a selective program taught by Harvard faculty who developed many of the negotiation and mediation frameworks now used throughout the field.

He has also been entrusted with neutral roles by the courts. He served as a Judge Pro Tem in the San Francisco Superior Court, where he heard and decided discovery disputes referred to him by the court. He has also been appointed as a special master in California criminal proceedings.

These appointments reflect the trust of the bench and a demonstrated ability to handle sensitive matters neutrally, competently, and under pressure. Holding both roles, alongside formal mediator training from Harvard, is uncommon for a private mediator at any stage of practice.

How He Works

Before mediation, John-Paul reads the briefs, operative agreements, and documents counsel identify as central to the case. He holds calls with each side’s counsel, often more than one, to understand the dispute beyond what the briefs convey.

He asks the kinds of questions parties may not be ready for the first time they hear them, so that when mediation begins, the parties can get to work rather than spend the morning briefing the mediator.

His approach during the day depends on what the case needs. Some disputes settle because someone finally tells a party something it does not want to hear. Others settle because the parties feel heard for the first time. He has done both, and he reads each case for what will actually move it.

When a case does not resolve on the scheduled day, John-Paul continues working with counsel afterward. A meaningful share of his settlements come together in the days and weeks that follow.